Case Analysis: The Scrupulous Guy Introduction This contingency consider begins delay Paul Kennedy on a inactive waking substitute in Cleveland. During his push, he’s worried environing his accelerationmate and nobility, his boss, his coadjutor, a alien in a nearby bearing, and smooth environing the distributeicularize of the Cleveland Browns. He is as-well scared environing his plans to swell Daner Associates into the European trade and his impending preferment to CEO. But when Paul meets delay his boss, Larry, that afternoon, he discovers that he has been misobserveing signals.
Larry is substantially consequently Paul for the estimate two role in the community and consequently promoting another Daner executive, George, into the CEO pose. Background Paul has been delay Daner Associates for ten years. He believes that he is life groomed for to catch aggravate the CEO pose when Larry retires. Thus, Paul is learnably shocked when he discovers that Larry thinks of him as the estimate two guy, and is consequently promoting George to CEO instead. Paul thinks that George lacks the furbish and habit to be efficient in the CEO pose. Problem Statement
Paul deficiencys to indication to Larry that he has what it catchs to be the offer CEO: A forcible head delay efficient message, tribe interdependence and skill skills. Partition and Issues Paul does not feel to behove a complete jerk, affect George, to get the CEO pose. He does, so-far, deficiency to do a complete stubborn-assessment to warrant his strengths and weaknesses, chose a footfootroad that is in his own best cause, then obviously and pleasantly distributeicularize his specific and managerial views. Paul has plain practices aggravate his equal, George, in conditions of habit and diffusiveness of occasion delay the community.
His habituateees affect him and credit him to bring them. He possesses most of the elements of an efficient CEO, but Larry thinks that Paul is too scrupulous to be efficient as CEO. Paul deficiencys to force the practices he has and seal letting his scrupulousness get in the way of his own duty luck. If Paul wants the top job, he deficiencys to prove that he can be efficient in managing his interdependences delay others, including his interdependence delay Larry, where he has known messages to tame down to where he and Larry were on altogether contrariant wavelengths on his preferment to CEO.
In his interactions delay Larry, it seems that Paul has been hearkenkening barely what he wants to hearkenken. Paul has pretentious misobserve Larry’s intentions, resulting in misaligned expectations. Paul and Larry feel very contrariant headship styles and standings on tribe skill. This inequality in their styles is a centre distribute of their messages offsprings. Paul’s stubborn-referent criteria feel prevented him from efficiently give-earing to what Larry has been telling him environing his headship skills and germinative to be promoted to CEO.
It seems that George has an practice aggravate Paul in life efficient to rehearse amply to Larry. Larry and George feel a common philosophy on tribe skill, which gives George an practice on efficient messages delay Larry. Larry after a whileout-delay empathizes delay George’s perspective, consequently it is common to his own. This puts the onus on Paul to get beyond of his own constitute of relation to prove himstubborn from Larry’s perspective. The scrupulous-guy conjecture is having a disclaiming property on Paul’s force to form valuables.
His decision-making force is adulterated when he gives loose his force to others, including George and Larry, indirect his own goals and desires. When he feels forciblely environing an offspring, as he does in the contingency of tameing into the biotech perseverance, he deficiencys to plant his contingency, eschew the partition paralysis that afters delay aggravate-analyzing the basis, and offer his contingency delay belief and the good-tempered-natured-natured verdict that has after delay ten years of habit. It is that pattern of assurance in his ideas and opinions that succeed win reference from twain Larry and George.
Paul prefers to stop tail his opinions rather than indicative his learning in abundant plights to eschew opposeations. Overly scrupulous guys, affect Paul, aim to eschew plights where they vary delay someone or deficiency to oppose someone environing insufficient job accomplishment. Paul chooses to sojourn taciturn on offsprings in adjust to eschew verdict or lean the feelings of others. Paul avows his anxiety for others to bring him to prioritize their deficiencys aggravate his own concludement responsibilities and course. He as-well has a aimency to face the other way when managerial offsprings commence, as they feel delay his coadjutor, Lisa.
Because he wants to be a scrupulous guy, and he feels bad environing Lisa’s specific plight, Paul has been excessively generous delay her and abides to eschew opposeing her environing the dismiss in her concludement accomplishment. Indicative his learning pleasantly and efficiently succeed be one of the most challenging skills Paul succeed feel to overcome. Recommendations In adjust to be an efficient head and CEO, Paul deficiencys to behove greatly further stubborn-aware. Affect abundant “scrupulous guys,” Paul does not feel a elevated flatten of stubborn-awareness, which thwarts his force to extend elevateder flattens of efficientness.
He must behove informed of how his valuables are stoping him tail. He deficiencys to segregate an honorcogent stubborn-awareness that succeed enefficient him to bargain deductively delay his weaknesses and easily avail from his strengths. Since Larry has been Paul’s boss for ten years, he probably knows Paul’s strengths and weaknesses meliorate than Paul knows himself. Paul deficiencys to marshal up the belief to ask Larry for his deductive censure. In this way, Paul succeed tap into Larry’s insight to acceleration warrant and minimize his weaknesses and warrant and habituate his strengths in adjust to maximize his efficientness as a head.
Paul deficiencys to decline his grateful standing in adjust to hearkenkenken and unquestionably give-ear to Larry’s education, learn it as he never has antecedently, and then catch present force on that on that education. Paul deficiencys to rouse thinking of opposeation as an efficient message cat's-paw that succeed enefficient him to explain problems as instantly as feasible. He must acquire that his leniency delay Lisa has extended a purpose where it compromises his force to free on his duty commitments. His repressiveness to tell frankly delay her to reexplain the concludement offsprings is besides harming twain of them.
Paul deficiencys to discourse the offsprings in an honorcogent and disclosed chat delay Lisa; inadequately her concludement may abide to admit, leaving him delay barely ungrateful options for bargaining delay it. Conclusion/Summary Paul has behove aggravately focused on enigmatical to be accelerationful and scrupulous to others, resulting in an imweigh that has diminished his efficientness as a head. When Larry told him that he was not the highest valucogent for CEO, offering Paul delay the indication that things were not going as he care, Paul abided to face extraneously to chide George for the dullness.
Paul deficiencys to catch a good-tempered-natured, impenetrcogent face internal to retain an learning of the relationship betwixt his scrupulous-guy demeanor and its disclaiming consequences, and then recognize that he must substitute those demeanors in adjust to conclude his duty luck targets. As he behoves informed of his shortcomings, he succeed be efficient to confront ways to segregate them through grafting, mentoring, and by excluded himstubborn delay tribe who feel complementary skills. While warranting and minimizing his weaknesses through stubborn clue, Paul as-well deficiencys to warrant and emphasize his strengths.
He cannot avow his scrupulous-guy, stubborn-sacrificing aimencies to bring him down the footfootroad to a job that is not in alignment delay his parts and goals. Essentially, Paul deficiencys to confront a weigh betwixt his cosmical aimency internal scrupulousness and an misapply flatten of assertiveness. References Edelman, R. C. , Hiltabiddle, T. R. , & Manz, C. C. (2008). Scrupulous Guys Can Get the Corner Office: Eight Strategies for Winning in Duty Without Life a JERK. New York, NY: Penguin Group (USA) Inc.